If there is one name that unites teammates, coaches, opponents and analysts alike, it is Annabel Sutherland. In a women’s cricket landscape crowded with specialists, Sutherland stands apart as a rare, modern all-rounder, someone who bowls crunch overs with pace and control, and bats with a temperament that once made pressure situations her natural habitat. Even in a year where her batting numbers have dipped, the consensus remains unchanged: she is the best cricketer in the women’s game right now.
Yet, 2025 has been a year of contrast. Annabel Sutherland the bowler has been outstanding, a banker across formats. Annabel Sutherland the batter, particularly in white-ball cricket, has flickered rather than flared and the numbers tell a story that is too consistent to ignore.
Across ODIs this year, Sutherland has scored 247 runs in 11 innings at an average of 30.87, all from the No.5 position. On the surface, respectable. But dig deeper and the concern sharpens. Against spin, she has been dismissed six times in 10 innings, averaging 28.7 with a strike-rate of 83.9 and a dot-ball percentage north of 50. In T20Is, the problem becomes starker: just 14 runs from spin across five innings at an average of 7.0. In T20 leagues, the Women’s Hundred, WBBL and WPL combined, she has been dismissed 13 times by spin in 26 innings.
The pattern is unmistakable. Off-spin and leg-spin, from Alice Capsey and Charlie Dean to Amelia Kerr, Ashleigh Gardner and Sarah Glenn, have repeatedly found a way through her defences. This is not about a technical flaw alone; it is about intent clashing with instinct.
Sutherland’s greatest batting strength has never been blind aggression. It has been her ability to read conditions, absorb pressure and then expand. Her lone ODI World Cup match-winning knock and her superb Ashes innings this year came when she allowed herself time, when she trusted her defence before unfurling her power. In Tests, the evidence is emphatic: 163 runs in a single innings, adapting to both pace and spin with patience and clarity.
But in 2025’s white-ball cricket, particularly the shortest format, Sutherland appears to be forcing evolution. The numbers suggest she is trying to attack from ball one, especially against spin, and that approach has cost her rhythm. In T20s, her strike-rate against pace (130.0) comfortably outstrips her returns against spin (117.9), yet dismissals come quicker when she pre-meditates rather than settles.
This shift has had a ripple effect. Australia, so often powered by Sutherland’s calm presence in the middle order, have occasionally felt that absence of ballast. When she stays, Australia dominate tempo. When she falls early, the innings feels hurried.
None of this diminishes her stature. If anything, it underlines how close she is to being uncontainable. As a bowler, she is already elite. If Sutherland recalibrates her batting back to its core strength, trust first, attack later, she does not just regain form; she becomes inevitable.
The future of Australian cricket is already wearing gold. The only question now is whether Annabel Sutherland allows patience to reclaim its rightful place in her game. If she does, the rest of the world may find there is simply no answer.
Follow Revsportz for latest sports news
