Picture credit- X
There are sporting contests, and then there is the Ashes – a rivalry older than the automobile and the radio broadcast. Every two years, whether under a Melbourne sun or beneath grey English skies, the Ashes returns like a grand old play — rehearsed for 140 years but performed with fresh fire each time. In a world increasingly shaped by white-ball cricket’s dazzle and speed, the real marvel is this: the Ashes still feels timeless. It still evokes that lump-in-the-throat nostalgia, the kind that binds great-grandfathers to grandsons in a single breath.
But as the Ashes 2025 begins, the question looms larger than ever: has the brand been diluted, or has it simply transformed with the times?
To understand why the Ashes is immune to fading relevance, you have to go back … way back. To 1882, when England, stunned by defeat at The Oval thanks to Frederick Spofforth’s sorcery, received that now-famous newspaper mock obituary mourning “the death of English cricket”. A bail was burned, a mythical urn imagined, and a rivalry that mirrored the parent–child tension of empire and colony was born.
Through the decades that followed, Victor Trumper strode out like a demigod on damp English mornings. Douglas Jardine’s Bodyline in 1932–33 transformed cricket into psychological warfare, with Harold Larwood bowling thunderbolts aimed not just at Don Bradman but at the very spirit of the game. Bradman’s Invincibles of 1948 turned perfection into performance art. Botham’s 1981 miracle, when England rose from the ashes (quite literally) to shock Australia, rekindled belief in sporting resurrection. And then came Shane Warne’s 1993 Gatting ball — arguably cricket’s single most replayed delivery — forever blurring the line between skill and sorcery. This is not just history. This is mythology. And mythology, by definition, does not dilute – it deepens.
Yes, some rituals have vanished. No more leisurely sea voyages. No more touring the length of Britain against county sides to acclimatise. No more six-Test marathons stretching over four months. Today’s Ashes is brisker, more commercial, and more clipped by the demands of T20 leagues and player workloads. Critics claim this compresses the mystique. But the rivalry’s essence? If anything, it burns hotter.
Modern Ashes heroes — Steve Smith, Joe Root, Pat Cummins, Ben Stokes, Stuart Broad — operate in a pressure cooker amplified by social media and millions of eyeballs. The players feel the weight of history every time they cross the rope. Dilution implies loss of flavour. The Ashes today tastes different, but it is far from bland.
If one series proved that evolution can be electrifying, it was Ashes 2023. England’s Bazball philosophy — audacious, philosophical, bordering on anarchic — collided with Australia’s old-school steel. It produced a contest that was equal parts Test cricket and theatre, with sessions oscillating wildly and crowds roaring in a way more associated with T20 nights.
This is not dilution. This is reinvention. It’s the Ashes finding a second wind in a new cricket economy.
On the eve of the opening Test, Steve Smith pulled no punches when responding to Monty Panesar’s suggestion that England should rattle him about the 2018 “sandpaper” scandal. Rather than address the offence directly, Smith launched into a mocking aside: “Who of you in the room has seen Mastermind, and Monty Panesar on that? … Anyone who believes that Athens is in Germany, Oliver Twist is a season of the year, and America is a city … doesn’t really bother me, those comments.” The barb, targeting Panesar’s ill-fated quiz-show appearance, added an unexpected personal twist to what should’ve been a standard pre-series press conference, cracking open the psychological tension between these old foes.
For more updates follow the REVSPORRTZ app.